Move more things to the server was: UI changes in reporting of exceptions

Jaroslav Tulach <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.netbeans.user-interface
Organization Sun Microsystems
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi.
After reading Jesse's comments and comments from (former) QA guys I guess I 
tend to agree with both:
1. there is a value in simple stacktrace
2. a stacktrace is more valueable if there is a comment, component, and email 
to the reporter

I guess there is an easy fix to this. Make it as easy for the user to send us 
the stacktrace and bother it with the additional questions then - when we 
already have the stacktrace.

This imho means we should add more dialogs to the browser page that is opened 
we receive user's data. E.g. let the user submit the data to the server and 
only then asking him whether it is duplicate or not, what is his comment, 
preferred component, etc.

This would imho satisfy both point of view. 
-jst

PS: I've already told Jindra how to modify the browser page, so he can try it 
and then we can compare the results.


<quote who="Jesse Glick">
> Jindrich Sedek wrote:
> > We don't need mounts of stacktraces without any info. It's not
> > valuable for us.
>
> I disagree. *One* stack trace without any info is not very valuable.
> 5113 identical stack traces in the first month after a release is very
> valuable information. It means that part of the code is badly broken and
> unreliable. It may not be obvious at first why the code is broken, but
> the developer responsible for this code had better spend some time
> looking at it very carefully, and making some kind of fix - at a
> minimum, adding better diagnostics.
>
> > I believe user can give us some more information, why not to ask him
> > to give us some help?
>
> We don't want to make it look like work or most people will just hit
> Cancel. The user is already probably frustrated and has a low opinion of
> the IDE if an exception was just thrown. Maybe offer an "Advanced>>"
> section for people who are knowledgeable about nb.org issue tracking to
> select a specific component, add details about how to reproduce, enter a
> nb.org user ID, etc. Just make it clear that the average user does not
> need to do anything except click "Send".
>
> -J.

-- 
/** 
* @author Jaroslav Tulach
* @see http://www.netbeans.org
*/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.