Re: What is missing??

Hi Jan,

I mean both:

Functionality is poor - Example: I cannot name calls in activity diagram

Layout is poor - Maybe I am expecting too much, but I want to see nice
layout if I spend days looking on the UML diagrams. Of course, some may say
that layout is not important, but I say - everything is important - small
spoon of dirt can spoils barrel of honey ;-)

I LOVE NB - I WANT TO HAVE GREAT UML TOOLS!

Jan Rojcek wrote:
> 
> On 14 Sep 2007, at 22:04, minimedj wrote:
> 
>> 2. GOOD UML Tools. I am really missing good quality UML tools.  
>> Those that
>> exists looks very cheap. Look how it could look like:
>> http://res.sys-con.com/story/dec06/313602/jellema-fig1.jpg
> 
> Do you mean that you don't like the visual appearance of NetBeans UML  
> tools? Or it's more about the features and function of NB UML tools?  
> If it's the latter, can you comment on what exactly you don't like  
> about NB UML?
> 
> Thanks,
> Jano
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/What-is-missing---tf4444972.html#a13112707
Sent from the Netbeans - UI mailing list archive at Nabble.com.