Re: Features from other IDEs and general usability (new features, borrowed features, and general changes)
"Anuradha G" <[email protected]> Fri, 2 Nov 2007 18:35:00 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.netbeans.user-interface |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Agree with you I have remove configuration combo from tool bar coz I'm using tool bar as quick actions that I regular use.Changing configuration is not a regular tack for me so I'm happy without combo BUT I prefer split button to change run configuration On 11/2/07, Wade Chandler <[email protected]> wrote: > > This isn't a rant, but just as I see some things which need to be talked > about. I have seen others in the community mention such things. I don't want > to single anything out, but I have picked an issue as an illustration. > > See: > http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105664 > > for some context. > > I want to touch on usability as we have already mentioned Eclipse and IDEA > in the issue above. No matter what any other IDE or project does we need to > have our own identity and it needs to be designed, IMO of course, for ease > of use and practicality. We can adopt features from other IDEs, but we > should always try to make sure the implementation works into our framework > and is very user friendly. Provide features yet innovate; we should strive > to make it better if it can be. > > I don't think we need to make UI choices in a vacuum, meaning just among a > UI or dev group, and I'm not saying this is 100% what happens either, so we > need to make sure we have community feedback and user studies if we could > pull them off would be good. There is a book called, "Don't make me think", > which is more web interface directed, but the premise applies, and it > contains cost effective ways of implementing user studies. > > It would be nice if someone could implement such things at NB days. We > could have a booth with the IDE setup and a few sample projects for people > wanted to volunteer to work through. We would have to ask them if they are > a long time NB user, from another IDE or not, or new to NB as the different > contexts will matter (maybe a change was made to the IDE based on some other > IDE...maybe it is a new feature..and if they never have used an IDE any > feature goes). There could be a tutorial setup for which ever sample they're > asked to walk through. Then have a camera so their reactions can be > recorded, and there is software, as mentioned in the book, which can capture > the screen activity. Then the users activity, facial expressions, and > comments are all captured in place. Then everyone knows what is working and > what isn't and has a better idea of the usability of different parts of the > system. > > Thanks, > > Wade > > -- Anuradha G