Re: [OSWF] Associating additional information to the Steps
Aníbal Rojas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.open-symphony.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | VALHALLA project, s.a. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ok, that is all the information availabe about the steps while in a transition. - Aníbal ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pat Lightbody" <[email protected]> To: "Aníbal Rojas" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 12:02 PM Subject: Re: [Opensymphony-developers] [OSWF] Associating additional information to the Steps Well, the plan is that the step would hold the step you are moving from and the step you are moving to. -Pat ----- Original Message ----- From: "Aníbal Rojas" <[email protected]> To: "Pat Lightbody" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 7:09 AM Subject: Re: [Opensymphony-developers] [OSWF] Associating additional information to the Steps > Pat, > > Adding it to the WorkflowContext would be fine. But the "step" would > hold the "current steps", right? > > Regards, > > Aníbal > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Pat Lightbody" <[email protected]> > To: "Aníbal Rojas" <[email protected]>; > <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 9:26 PM > Subject: Re: [Opensymphony-developers] [OSWF] Associating additional > information to the Steps > > > You are correct. > > Travis had wanted to see a new transientVars key called "step", but Hani and > I decided that adding it to the WorkflowContext would make more sense, which > is still planned before the 2.5 released. Keep an eye out for it. > > -Pat > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Aníbal Rojas" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 1:22 PM > Subject: [Opensymphony-developers] [OSWF] Associating additional information > to the Steps > > > > Hi, > > > > Using OSWorkflow 2.5.0 from CVS, I need to associate _persistent_ > > information to steps. I saw a previous dicussion ( Due Date feature ) > where > > Hani suggested to use the PropertySet inside a function to accomplish this > > kind of behavior. > > > > My question is, Do I know from wich Step (or Steps) I am coming from > in > > the Function, or the Steps where I am "going to"? I think I need this In > > order to associate the Step with the Information. > > > > The infomation I need to add is similar to the discussed in the "Due > > Date" Thread, is a Comment or Justification, for the Action. Of course we > > are trying to avoid the grow of the signature of methods adding this > > "message" parameter and reworking the whole AbstractWorkflow. > > > > Regards, > > > > Aníbal Rojas > > [email protected] > > 58+212+242.66.62 / 43.79 > > Fax: 58+212+243.68.09 > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-developers mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-developers > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-developers > > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf