Re: [OSWF] Associating additional information to the Steps

Aníbal Rojas <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.open-symphony.devel
Organization VALHALLA project, s.a.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Ok, that is all the information availabe about the steps while in a
transition.

- Aníbal

----- Original Message -----
From: "Pat Lightbody" <[email protected]>
To: "Aníbal Rojas" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Opensymphony-developers] [OSWF] Associating additional
information to the Steps


Well, the plan is that the step would hold the step you are moving from and
the step you are moving to.

-Pat

----- Original Message -----
From: "Aníbal Rojas" <[email protected]>
To: "Pat Lightbody" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 7:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Opensymphony-developers] [OSWF] Associating additional
information to the Steps


> Pat,
>
>     Adding it to the WorkflowContext would be fine. But the "step" would
> hold the "current steps", right?
>
>     Regards,
>
> Aníbal
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pat Lightbody" <[email protected]>
> To: "Aníbal Rojas" <[email protected]>;
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 9:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [Opensymphony-developers] [OSWF] Associating additional
> information to the Steps
>
>
> You are correct.
>
> Travis had wanted to see a new transientVars key called "step", but Hani
and
> I decided that adding it to the WorkflowContext would make more sense,
which
> is still planned before the 2.5 released. Keep an eye out for it.
>
> -Pat
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Aníbal Rojas" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 1:22 PM
> Subject: [Opensymphony-developers] [OSWF] Associating additional
information
> to the Steps
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >     Using OSWorkflow 2.5.0 from CVS, I need to associate _persistent_
> > information to steps. I saw a previous dicussion ( Due Date feature )
> where
> > Hani suggested to use the PropertySet inside a function to accomplish
this
> > kind of behavior.
> >
> >     My question is, Do I know from wich Step (or Steps) I am coming from
> in
> > the Function, or the Steps where I am "going to"? I think I need this In
> > order to associate the Step with the Information.
> >
> >     The infomation I need to add is similar to the discussed in the "Due
> > Date" Thread, is a Comment or Justification, for the Action. Of course
we
> > are trying to avoid the grow of the signature of methods adding this
> > "message" parameter and reworking the whole AbstractWorkflow.
> >
> >     Regards,
> >
> > Aníbal Rojas
> > [email protected]
> > 58+212+242.66.62 / 43.79
> > Fax: 58+212+243.68.09
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > _______________________________________________
> > Opensymphony-developers mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-developers
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-developers
>
>






-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.