Re: mavenized oscore, propertyset & osu se r

If you get it working on ANY version of weblogic, that's what'll be 
adopted. I'm perfectly happy if it's 7.2+, with easy to follow docs on 
how to deploy it (I just got it at least deploying sorta cleanly out of 
the box on weblogic 8.1)

On Dec 18, 2003, at 9:55 PM, Nick Faiz wrote:

> I'm interested in helping out.
>
> My only hesitation is that the WebLogic adapter in OSUser uses 
> deprecated
> WebLogic 6.1 libraries. I'd have to write code to use it properly with 
> the
> new Security model in WebLogic 7.2 and thereafter. If it isn't adopted 
> by
> OpenSymphony, it means I might as well have coded a simpler API from 
> scratch
> to begin with ...
>
> I'll see how I go getting the OSUser example to run on WebLogic. If I 
> can do
> that successfully I'll document the alterations I made. That might be a
> decent first step.
>
> Nick Faiz
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, 19 December 2003 1:51 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Opensymphony-developers] mavenized oscore, propertyset & 
> osuse
> r
>
> [email protected] wrote on 19/12/2003
> 01:26:53 PM:
>
>> Right, the reason there is no build isn't because we're all too stupid
>> to know how to make one and make it available for download. The reason
>> is because there isn't sufficient documentation, and people who
>> download it in its current state are expected to know how to navigate
>> their way around a cvs tree.
>
> So the reason there is no 'official' or nightly or milestone build of
> OsUser is because there isn't sufficient documentation? What the?
>
> Raising a barrier to using a piece of software sorta defeats the 
> purpose.
>
>>> Who could give a rats ass about pluggable providers if they can't 
>>> work
>
>>> out
>>> how to use the thing in the first place. It hasn't had a 1.0 release
>>> and
>>> someone has already 'started refactoring it mercilessly'.  Sounds 
>>> like
>>> Maven all over again.
>>>
>> Yep, I agree with your points, but maven has NOTHING to do with this.
>> Nor will it solve any of these problems, so it's utterly irrelevant.
>
> 100% agree with you.
>
>> You know what, maybe you shouldn't use it. It's clearly not of the
>> quality you expect, nor mature enough, so why not just move on?
> Not of the quality I expect, maybe. Mature enough - I don't care.
>
> Move on? I'd rather help you guys (and myself) by making it better, 
> but it
> seems noone is interested.
>
> Are you?
> --
> dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> Blog:      http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
> Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for 
> IBM's
> Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys 
> admin.
> Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-developers
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
> Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for 
> IBM's
> Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys 
> admin.
> Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-developers
>



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click