Re: Quartz and OpenSymphony

Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:

>>One other issue to go with is naming, do you want to stick with the
>>quartz name, or go with something like OSScheduler (or something else
>>entirely)? The choice is entirely yours. Once that's decided, I'll
>>register the new name as a subproject of opensymphony.com, you get set
>>up as project owner, etc etc
>>    
>>
>
>Noooo! please don't! Please stay with Quartz. OSScheduler is such a dull
>name - OS* should be axed :) 
>  
>
I agree, I'd like to stick with Quartz.  Quartz has great name 
recognition, and I think it's a pretty good name for a scheduler.

Let me know when it's set up on java.net.  Also, can someone tell me how 
to go about moving content onto the OpenSymphony website?  I'll be 
starting on this later this week, or next.  (I'm working crunch mode at 
work for a few more days).

james




-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn