[Opensymphony-oscache] Configuration of JMS compared to JavaGroups

Hi,
I have looked at using clustered caching via JMS and JavaGroups. If I interpret the documentation correctly, it is more difficult to get JMS up and running compared to JavaGroups, since JMS requires a node name to be set that is different per node (via cache.cluster.jms.node.name). This would mean that the configuration will be different for each JMS node. I am currently intending to generate a GUID for the node name so that I don't have to worry about different configurations, since I don't see an easy way to get the actual node name configured in a clustered appserver environment. Is this an idea that will work or am I missing something? 
Also, is it an idea to allow for a GUID based name as a standard option? I.e. in this case OSCache will take care of the node name i.s.o. the user of OSCache.

Thanks,
Rintcius

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2922&messageID=7899#7899