Re: Benchmarks ?

I don't know of any published benchmarks sorry (although I think when 
OSCache 2.0 was released someone posted some times comparing 1.7.5 vs 
2.0 on a blog somewhere? 2.0 was significantly faster mainly thanks to 
some improvements with the LRU algorithm code).

However you want benchmarks in comparison to what, and in what context? 
When used even vaguely correctly ANY caching solution will give you 
orders of magnitude improvements over accessing uncached data. If you 
want comparisons against other caching solutions, then I'd point out 
that even if one solution is twice as slow as another, you'd still be 
getting huge benefits over the uncached situation, so you'd be better 
off worrying about features, support and so forth instead.

Having said that, we do care about OSCache's performance, so if you do 
come up with any numbers then we'd be interested to see them!

Chris


Paul Kavanagh wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I'm trying to convince my boss to use OSCache and he's asking for some benchmarks but I can't find any.
> 
> Does anyone know of any ? Or a list of referencable websites would be great too (theserverside.com uses OSCache as well as Coherence, right ?)
> 
> I guess I could put together an informal benchmark with JMeter, but it would be great if there were more formal tests already recorded that I could reference.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> -Paul
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
> Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
> Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
> Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78&alloc_id371&op=click



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click