Re: Bunch of issues...

> > I also like to add that whatever respect you
> should
> > get for being well-versed in the art of java
> > programming is totally outdone by your attitude. 
> > The way you brought up these points (whether or
> not
> > they are valid, I'll leave that as an exercise to
> the
> > reader) is below all standards.
> > 
> > If you do something about your lack of manners and
> > ego problem, we'll address these issues.
> 
> Oh come on, this attitude is even worse than mine!
> You fixing issues and making ww easier to use isn't
> for my personal benefit (I can figure out ways around
> all of them), but something to make life better for
> future users. The only people you're hurting with
> this is people who consider using webwork but are
> driven off by its continuing lack of polish. Anyway,
> I don't want to degenerate further into a discussion
> of manners, so lets set that aside.

Unfortunealy, no. I think most devs/other regulars will agree that I'm a very easy-going person, and I take most things with a smile. Your post is different. It's no 'hey guys, I got some issues, please address them'.

We often get very experienced programmers here, and 99% of them manages to express their concerns/problems/ideas in a non-offending way.
Feel free to post as you wish on your blog, but please drop that attitude when posting here.
I'm still a youngster - and I lack a lot of the expertise which you do posses, and as such I'm not offended by your statements - but showing the minimal amount of respect for other devs by being polite when posting in their forum is one of the qualities I imagined at least all great OS developers had in common.

As for the fixing issues thing: of course deficits and bugs should be fixed, and of course they are totally unrelated to your attitude - I meant 'while you do something about your attitude, we'll (try to) fix these things'. But that was not the point I was making.

> 
> The date workaround is kinda ugly, but I spose it's
> good enough for those who really need it. Any idea
> why the picker initially shows a truncated format
> when first shown?

WW will automatically use date conversion (DateFormat.MEDIUM of your Action's Locale) when printing a date. The datepicker tries to do its own Locale determination and formatting - the mismatch between those two is causing the problem - afaict.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=26282&messageID=51868#51868

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]