Re: architecture

We utilize Struts 2.1.6 with the JSF plugin for when we want some of  
the features of jsf. While it is true that you can produce a jsf app  
faster today than a struts2, the struts app will preform better and  
use less resources. So the question the old one of balancing dev time  
vers long term operational cost.

T SnowWolf Wagner

On Sep 7, 2009, at 6:03 AM, measwel <[email protected]>  
wrote:

>
> Thank you Mike,
>
> That is exactly the type of architecture I was thinking about; jsf  
> 2.0 +
> seam + facelets + spring + hibernate. The only thing I was concerned  
> about,
> was the scalability of jsf 2.0. I understand, that it should not be a
> problem, as long as the applicaton is not ill-designed. I am trying  
> to get
> my IDE set up for using these technologies right now.
>
> Take care,
> Marek
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/architecture-tp25319857p25328026.html
> Sent from the java.net - webwork users mailing list archive at Nabble.com 
> .
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>