Re: configuration
Jason Calabrese <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.openamf.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
You shouldn't need to do any configuration if you use the DefaultGateway. With the AdvancedGateway you can use the configuration to map an AMF request to many different type of methods such POJO's, EJB's, Web Services, etc. On Monday 25 October 2004 10:22 pm, Ian Pojman wrote: > is there any reason not to have an easier way to configure services? I > didnt have a <type>*</type> for a method and it didnt work - that > might be a bug to fix - but I was wondering why this couldn't just > magically happen via reflection? at least for JavaInvoker.... why > should I have to put anything in openamf-config.xml if I don't want to > customize the method behavior? it seems as if reflection could do... > any reasons for doing it the current way? > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > Openamf-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openamf-user ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl