Re: Flex 2 doesnt support AMF/Remoting

If that is true...I think that we're again in the same ship. Without
Remoting, Flex is useless.

But, I think that you could workaround the problem using remoting
classes, isn't it?



2005/10/18, hank williams <[email protected]>:
> It appears that MM is not supporting remoting except for with flex
> enterprise services.
>
> I hope I am wrong, but everything I read in the docs appears to
> confirm that they are "allowing" us to use soap and std http to
> communicate with flex apps, but if you want the "convenience" of AMF
> and remoting, you need to do that with flex enterprise services, which
> will, I am sure, be priced in a similar manner to the old flex 1.5.
>
> As far as I can tell, what this means is that all current apps using
> remoting will be obsoleted. Can this be?
>
> I would love for someone more knowledgeable than me to say I am wrong.
> Any takers.
>
> Hank
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
> and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
> _______________________________________________
> Openamf-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openamf-user
>


--
::| Carlos Rovira
::| http://www.carlosrovira.com


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl