Re: Is openamf dying?
Todd Hivnor <[email protected]> Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:22:23 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.openamf.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I use OpenAMF for production application. I don't consider it dead at all .. RC11 works very well, as have previous "Release Candidates." I would love to see RC12 or a 1.0 release, personally. If nothing else, what is in CVS now actually compiles. I had a very difficult time getting RC11 to compile, but had no problem once I pulled down new code from CVS. re: OpenAMF works great nowadays and only needs people contributing a help feature to become a 1.0 final release. What "help feature" are we looking for? I assume you just mean better documentation, not any new feature, right? If there was something straight-forward that needs doing, such as documentation, I could contribute some energy. I would love to see the project as 1.0 status. - Todd Sean Sullivan wrote: > > The OpenAMF project is still alive. I committed 4 bug fixes this week. > > There will be a new release within the next 7 days. > > My company is using OpenAMF in production. We have 3 applications that > use OpenAMF. > > Sean > > Gottin wrote: >> I'm asking if openamf is dying, because there have been no changes >> released for more than an year. It is a superb replace of macromedia's >> flash remoting, however I think that people should know if no future >> development is done on it. >> >> 10x for your replays >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642