Re: Is openamf dying?

I am reluctant to give OpenAMF a "1.0 final" designation until there is
adequate documentation. I'd like to have a "User's Guide"   or
a "Getting Started" document to bundle with the distribution.

The next release will be 1.0RC12

Sean

Todd Hivnor wrote:
> I use OpenAMF for production application. I don't consider it dead at
> all .. RC11 works very well, as have previous "Release Candidates."
>
> I would love to see RC12 or a 1.0 release, personally. If nothing
> else, what is in CVS now actually compiles. I had a very difficult
> time getting RC11 to compile, but had no problem once I pulled down
> new code from CVS.
>
>
> re: OpenAMF works great nowadays and only needs people contributing a
> help feature to become a 1.0 final release.
>
> What "help feature" are we looking for? I assume you just mean better
> documentation, not any new feature, right? If there was something
> straight-forward that needs doing, such as documentation, I could
> contribute some energy. I would love to see the project as 1.0 status.
>
> - Todd
>




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642