Re: memory leak due to handler registry for stateful beans

Great. Looks like you can now try to run the full ejb suite :)

> Am 25.01.2026 um 15:29 schrieb kartik sirigeri <[email protected]>:
> 
> @rzo1,
> that seemed to work,
> ===============================================================================
> 
>    1/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#exceptionTest1
> - PASSED
>    2/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#exceptionTest2
> - PASSED
>    3/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#exceptionTest3
> - PASSED
>    4/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#exceptionTest4
> - PASSED
>    5/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#exceptionTest5
> - PASSED
>    6/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#passByReferenceTest1
> - PASSED
>    7/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#passByReferenceTest2
> - PASSED
>    8/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#passByReferenceTest3
> - PASSED
>    9/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#passByReferenceTest4
> - PASSED
>    10/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#passByReferenceTest5
> - PASSED
>    11/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#passByValueTest
> - PASSED
>    12/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#runtimeExceptionTest1
> - PASSED
>    13/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#runtimeExceptionTest2
> - PASSED
>    14/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#runtimeExceptionTest3
> - PASSED
>    15/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#runtimeExceptionTest4
> - PASSED
>    16/-0/?0 -
> com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/bb/localaccess/statelessclient/Client#java#runtimeExceptionTest5
> - PASSED
> 
> ===============================================================================
> 
> Completed running 16 tests (0:00:33.670):
> 
>    Passed: 16
>    Failed: 0
>    Errors: 0
> 
> ===============================================================================
> 
> Regards
> Kartik Sirigeri
> 
> 
> On Sun, 25 Jan 2026 at 13:23, Richard Zowalla <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Yes - it might be required to do some more changes (aside from the update
>> on the version of TomEE). Best would be to keep all your changes on a
>> branch, so we can PR the ASF repo later.
>> 
>> Regarding the issue: The lib is now called
>> 
>> libre-wsdl4j-1.12.0.jar
>> 
>> I think, that you need to update CommandSupport.groovy#263 to match the
>> new pattern.
>> 
>> Gruß
>> Richard
>> 
>>> Am 25.01.2026 um 07:36 schrieb kartik sirigeri <[email protected]
>>> :
>>> 
>>> Hi @rzo1, <>
>>> 
>>> I tried running the tck, but it failed. It looks like it is looking up
>> for wsdl jars, attached the log for the command ./runtests --web
>> tomee-plume com.sun.ts.tests.ejb30.bb.localaccess.statelessclient.
>>> I had to make a small change in pom.xml to run.
>>> changed the below,
>>> <openejb.inzip.version>10.0.0-M3-SNAPSHOT</openejb.inzip.version>
>>>    <tomee.inzip.version>10.0.0-M3-SNAPSHOT</tomee.inzip.version>
>>>    <tomee.zip.groupId>org.apache.tomee</tomee.zip.groupId>
>>>    <tomee.zip.version>10.0.0-M3-SNAPSHOT</tomee.zip.version>
>>> 
>>> to,
>>> <openejb.inzip.version>10.1.4-SNAPSHOT</openejb.inzip.version>
>>>    <tomee.inzip.version>10.1.4-SNAPSHOT</tomee.inzip.version>
>>>    <tomee.zip.groupId>org.apache.tomee</tomee.zip.groupId>
>>>    <tomee.zip.version>10.1.4-SNAPSHOT</tomee.zip.version>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> <>
>>> Regards
>>> Kartik Sirigeri
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sat, 24 Jan 2026 at 15:59, Richard Zowalla <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I think it was renamed to
>> https://github.com/apache/tomee-tck/blob/tomee-10-with-ee-91/setup.sh
>>>> In any case the repo wasn’t touched for a while, so it might need some
>> additional love regarding TomEE 10 dependencies / Java version required to
>> run.
>>>> 
>>>> Gruß
>>>> Richard
>>>> 
>>>>> Am 24.01.2026 um 05:48 schrieb kartik sirigeri <
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>>>> 
>>>>> @rzo1 let me see if i can get the tck run, so i should be using the
>>>>> branch tomee-10-with-ee-91 to try out? and i could not see
>> setup-tck91.sh
>>>>> in the source as mentioned in the readme.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Kartik Sirigeri
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sat, 24 Jan 2026 at 00:04, Richard Zowalla <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks for stepping up.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think the first step would be to setup the EJB-related parts of
>> the TCK
>>>>>> located here: https://github.com/apache/tomee-tck
>>>>>> As mentioned by David in one of the comments, the most complete part
>> would
>>>>>> be the EE9.1 TCK since it is already setup.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think one could try to get it to work with a TomEE 10.1.x first
>> and if
>>>>>> that works out, we can try to remove the registry so we can directly
>> see
>>>>>> any sort of regression.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> WDYT? Do you want to give setting up the TCK a try? You are free to
>> ask
>>>>>> any question on the list - someone with xp in that area will surely
>> answer.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Gruß
>>>>>> Richard
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Am 23.01.2026 um 07:18 schrieb kartik sirigeri <
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi  @dblevins <https://github.com/dblevins> ,
>>>>>>> Starting a new thread for ,
>> https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/2408.
>>>>>>> Let me know how I get started with this. Went through the
>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/p6qht01wjtqfjrywzfkdbk492xkd4ol6 ,
>>>>>>> understand that this registry should be removed?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Kartik Sirigeri
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> <log.txt>