Re: [DISCUSS] TomEE 11 - next steps toward first release
Daniel Dias Dos Santos <[email protected]> Fri, 22 May 2026 08:35:05 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.openejb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOuqdjN0F_hCYDYOfkyvmMJYWMQPc-G61RFK0JV8ybGU5yjm9A@mail.gmail.com> |
--00000000000036e6240652666c07 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, +1 Thanks On Fri, May 22, 2026, 08:33 Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for M1 > > Am Fr., 22. Mai 2026 um 12:38 Uhr schrieb Richard Zowalla <[email protected]= g > >: > > > Hi all, > > > > You can find the current EE11 status here: [1]. > > > > The only remaining item on our EE11 implementation list is OpenJPA (whi= ch > > doesn't implement a few other JPA 2.x and 3.x features anyway), but it > > would work. > > > > The OPENJPA-2940 branch that passes the TCK hasn't been merged yet, but > > the OpenJPA folks are working on ironing out some niche quirks across t= he > > various DBMS out there. > > > > A few questions from my side: > > > > 1.) How do we want to proceed? What should we tackle next before going > for > > a first TomEE 11 release? Should we aim for Platform TCK coverage? (Not= e: > > we didn't do this for TomEE 10.0.x or 10.1.x due to resource > constraints.) > > > > 2.) Should we cut a milestone release to gather feedback, or go straigh= t > > to 11.0.0? ;-) Given our history, we could also do an M1 first (without > > OpenJPA JPA 3.2 support) and collect feedback that way. > > > > Happy to hear your thoughts and get a discussion going. > > > > Gru=C3=9F > > > > Richard > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE/issues/TOMEE-4530 > --00000000000036e6240652666c07--