RE: Connection pooling - dropping support for tyrex, proxool

I want commons-dbcp to be the default pool,
but I also want to remove any dependency on both tyrex and proxool.
This means removing the jars from $OPENJMS_HOME/lib and
removing the ProxoolConnectionManager and TyrexConnectionManager
wrappers.

I guess the wrapper classes could be moved to a contrib
directory so they're not totally gone from CVS, but I don't
see a lot of point in keeping them.

Were you planning to use tyrex for XA support?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Alateras [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 1 July 2003 5:46 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [openjms-developer] Connection pooling - dropping support
> for tyrex, proxool
>
>
> Tim,
>
> As long as we maintain support for the old connectors that is fine. If you
> are just saying you want to distribute commons-dbcp as the default
> connection pooling library then this is also fine, but I still
> want to have
> the option of using tyrex.
>
> cheers
> </jima>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: openjms-developer-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> > [mailto:openjms-developer-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org]On Behalf Of Tim
> > Anderson
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 5:36 PM
> > To: openjms-developer
> > Subject: [openjms-developer] Connection pooling - dropping support for
> > tyrex, proxool
> >
> >
> > OpenJMS uses old versions of tyrex (http://tyrex.sourceforge.net) and
> > proxool (http://proxool.sourceforge.net) for connection pooling. The
> > versions of
> > each are no longer readily available, which makes it hard to migrate the
> > build
> > environment over to maven.
> > Tyrex 1.0 is available, but is buggy and not actively maintained, and
> > the latest version of proxool requires JDK 1.3.
> >
> > To cut a fat story thin, I want to drop support for both
> > tyrex and proxool, and replace them with commons-dbcp
> > (http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/dbcp)
> > Standardising on a single connection pool implementation will
> > cut down the number of configurations we have to test for
> > each release.
> > Anyone who wants to plug in their own connection pool will
> > still be able to.
> >
> > Comments?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
> > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
> > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
> > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01
> > _______________________________________________
> > openjms-developer mailing list
> > openjms-developer-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openjms-developer
>
>