Re: Fw: OpenJms and Security

"Knut at work" <knut.lerpold-Y0ltV1YbkABUXjr8k6HNnAC/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.openjms.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Alateras" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; "Knut at work" <[email protected]>
Cc: "sourceforge-openjms-dev" <openjms-developer-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 10:52 AM
Subject: RE: [openjms-developer] Fw: OpenJms and Security


>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tim Anderson [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 8:32 PM
> > To: Knut at work; [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: [openjms-developer] Fw: OpenJms and Security
> >
> >
> > I've no problem with splitting APIs so long
> > as we can deprecate the existing functionality and
> > remove it in a future release.
> >
> > One thing I've been wanting to do is have
> > AdminConnectionFactory return AdminConnection instances
> > (never like the *Ifc naming convention ;), and
> > update the method signatures to use JDK 1.2 collections.
> > Splitting the API on responsibilities would be good as well.

+1 for this proposal, lets do it this way.

> >
> > +1 to rewrite of admin gui. More along the lines of
> > iBus//MessageServers GUI, than Sonic's which from memory was
> > awful.

You prob. refer to version 4 or lower of SonicMQ.
Have a look at the new SonicMQ version 5.0 - this is jmx-based and the
managment console is totaly rewritten.

>
> +1 to rewrite I also think it is worth looking into MQSeries Explorer.
>

Im not familiar with iBus and have not used MQSeries for a couple of
ears  -  Ill take a look.

> >
> > +0 to JMX support. Must confess I've never really looked into
> > it. I've been meaning to, along with the possibilities of making
> > the server Avalon based (http://avalon.apache.org), or perhaps
> > using one of the lighter weight containers such as picocontainer
> > (http://www.picocontainer.org).
>
> +1 To JMX support we could embed mx4j similar to the Avalon Phoenix
> container. We could then write a JMX-based management application
> (alternatively we could use third-party jmx enabled management
> applications). We could also look at OpenNMS, which I believe is a
> JMX-enabled management application
>
> There is a series of articles at IBM AlphaWorks on JMX. If anyone is
> interested you should be able to get to all 3 articles from here
> http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jmx3/
>
>
> It would also be nice to ditch our BasicService stuff and go do either one
> of the Avalon containers. The lightweight containers you mentioned are
still
> under heavt development. Has anyone looked into HiveMind
> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/hivemind/
>
>
> >
> > Top of my list at the moment is to get 0.7.6 ready.
> > This includes:
> > . fixing bugs reported by the CTS.
> > . migrating all of the docs to xdoc format, so the website
> >   can be completely generated by maven.
> >   I want to get rid of the PDF users guide which is too hard to
> >   maintain.
> > . finish the maven based build
> > . generating performance stats to get a feel for where the
> >   bottlenecks are. I hope to publish some data in the next
> >   week.
> >
> > -Tim
> >
> > PS: probably should keep posts on the developer list...
>
> +1
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Knut at work [mailto:knut.lerpold-Y0ltV1YbkABUXjr8k6HNnAC/[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, 23 July 2003 9:45 PM
> > > To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: [openjms-developer] Fw: OpenJms and Security
> > >
> > >
> > > I'll have a look at the Admin API and GUI.
> > > Wouldnt it be better to split the AdminItf into AdminItf
> > > (create/delete/udate) and MonitorItf for monitoring the system (count,
> > > destinationlist, userlist, etc.)???
> > >
> > > For now Ill auth. the admin against the users in db.
> > > For later we should have spesial. Admin-users.
> > >
> > > Actually what I have in mind for later is this:
> > > Users  <----many-to-many---> Groups
> > > Groups will contain two default groups: Administrators and PUBLIC
> > > Users will ALWAYS contain at least on user that is a member of
> > > Administrators and all users will by default become a member of
PUBLIC.
> > > By doing this it will be easy to impl. Acls
> > > (This pretty much like the way this is impl. in SonicMQ)
> > >
> > > I would also like to rewrite the Admin GUI when I find the
> > time, maybe in
> > > september.
> > > Maybe It should be ported to JMX??
> > >
> > >
> > > Sorry for all this thoughts/questions, but when you start to
> > > think..........
> > > :-)
> > >
> > >
> > > Unfortunatly we a have a delivery in apx. 3-4 weeks time and we are of
> > > course at least one month after sched. so Ill have to put a lot
> > > of effort in
> > > to that :-((
> > >
> > > K
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Tim Anderson" <[email protected]>
> > > To: <openjms-developer-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 5:49 AM
> > > Subject: RE: [openjms-developer] Fw: OpenJms and Security
> > >
> > >
> > > > A few more tasks:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Still to do, in no particular order:
> > > >
> > > > > 1. update remaining create_*.sql scripts to include the users
table.
> > > > > 2. add sql scripts to create the users tables, for existing
> > databases
> > > > > 3. update configuration reference xdoc to include
> > > <SecurityConfiguration/>
> > > > and <Users/>
> > > > > 4. add security section to the administrators guide xdocs
> > > > > 5. add user management to the admin GUI
> > > > > 6. update sample configs to include <SecurityConfiguration/> and
> > > <Users/>
> > > > > 7.  more testing. I'll be running it against the JMS CTS
> > over the next
> > > few
> > > > days.
> > > > > 8. Add encryption of password, to avoid sending it cleartext
> > > [optional]
> > > >
> > > > 9. Add authentication to the embedded JNDI provider
> > > > 10. Add authentication the administration API
> > > >
> > > > > If you (or anyone else for that matter) wants to do any of
> > the above,
> > > > please let me know.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
> > > > With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a
> > single machine.
> > > > WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual
> > machines at the
> > > > same time. Free trial click here:
http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > openjms-developer mailing list
> > > > openjms-developer-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openjms-developer
> > >
> > >
> >
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.