Re: Fw: OpenJms and Security
"Knut at work" <knut.lerpold-Y0ltV1YbkABUXjr8k6HNnAC/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.openjms.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Alateras" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]>; "Knut at work" <[email protected]> Cc: "sourceforge-openjms-dev" <openjms-developer-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 10:52 AM Subject: RE: [openjms-developer] Fw: OpenJms and Security > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tim Anderson [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 8:32 PM > > To: Knut at work; [email protected] > > Subject: RE: [openjms-developer] Fw: OpenJms and Security > > > > > > I've no problem with splitting APIs so long > > as we can deprecate the existing functionality and > > remove it in a future release. > > > > One thing I've been wanting to do is have > > AdminConnectionFactory return AdminConnection instances > > (never like the *Ifc naming convention ;), and > > update the method signatures to use JDK 1.2 collections. > > Splitting the API on responsibilities would be good as well. +1 for this proposal, lets do it this way. > > > > +1 to rewrite of admin gui. More along the lines of > > iBus//MessageServers GUI, than Sonic's which from memory was > > awful. You prob. refer to version 4 or lower of SonicMQ. Have a look at the new SonicMQ version 5.0 - this is jmx-based and the managment console is totaly rewritten. > > +1 to rewrite I also think it is worth looking into MQSeries Explorer. > Im not familiar with iBus and have not used MQSeries for a couple of ears - Ill take a look. > > > > +0 to JMX support. Must confess I've never really looked into > > it. I've been meaning to, along with the possibilities of making > > the server Avalon based (http://avalon.apache.org), or perhaps > > using one of the lighter weight containers such as picocontainer > > (http://www.picocontainer.org). > > +1 To JMX support we could embed mx4j similar to the Avalon Phoenix > container. We could then write a JMX-based management application > (alternatively we could use third-party jmx enabled management > applications). We could also look at OpenNMS, which I believe is a > JMX-enabled management application > > There is a series of articles at IBM AlphaWorks on JMX. If anyone is > interested you should be able to get to all 3 articles from here > http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jmx3/ > > > It would also be nice to ditch our BasicService stuff and go do either one > of the Avalon containers. The lightweight containers you mentioned are still > under heavt development. Has anyone looked into HiveMind > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/hivemind/ > > > > > > Top of my list at the moment is to get 0.7.6 ready. > > This includes: > > . fixing bugs reported by the CTS. > > . migrating all of the docs to xdoc format, so the website > > can be completely generated by maven. > > I want to get rid of the PDF users guide which is too hard to > > maintain. > > . finish the maven based build > > . generating performance stats to get a feel for where the > > bottlenecks are. I hope to publish some data in the next > > week. > > > > -Tim > > > > PS: probably should keep posts on the developer list... > > +1 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Knut at work [mailto:knut.lerpold-Y0ltV1YbkABUXjr8k6HNnAC/[email protected]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, 23 July 2003 9:45 PM > > > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [openjms-developer] Fw: OpenJms and Security > > > > > > > > > I'll have a look at the Admin API and GUI. > > > Wouldnt it be better to split the AdminItf into AdminItf > > > (create/delete/udate) and MonitorItf for monitoring the system (count, > > > destinationlist, userlist, etc.)??? > > > > > > For now Ill auth. the admin against the users in db. > > > For later we should have spesial. Admin-users. > > > > > > Actually what I have in mind for later is this: > > > Users <----many-to-many---> Groups > > > Groups will contain two default groups: Administrators and PUBLIC > > > Users will ALWAYS contain at least on user that is a member of > > > Administrators and all users will by default become a member of PUBLIC. > > > By doing this it will be easy to impl. Acls > > > (This pretty much like the way this is impl. in SonicMQ) > > > > > > I would also like to rewrite the Admin GUI when I find the > > time, maybe in > > > september. > > > Maybe It should be ported to JMX?? > > > > > > > > > Sorry for all this thoughts/questions, but when you start to > > > think.......... > > > :-) > > > > > > > > > Unfortunatly we a have a delivery in apx. 3-4 weeks time and we are of > > > course at least one month after sched. so Ill have to put a lot > > > of effort in > > > to that :-(( > > > > > > K > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Tim Anderson" <[email protected]> > > > To: <openjms-developer-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 5:49 AM > > > Subject: RE: [openjms-developer] Fw: OpenJms and Security > > > > > > > > > > A few more tasks: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Still to do, in no particular order: > > > > > > > > > 1. update remaining create_*.sql scripts to include the users table. > > > > > 2. add sql scripts to create the users tables, for existing > > databases > > > > > 3. update configuration reference xdoc to include > > > <SecurityConfiguration/> > > > > and <Users/> > > > > > 4. add security section to the administrators guide xdocs > > > > > 5. add user management to the admin GUI > > > > > 6. update sample configs to include <SecurityConfiguration/> and > > > <Users/> > > > > > 7. more testing. I'll be running it against the JMS CTS > > over the next > > > few > > > > days. > > > > > 8. Add encryption of password, to avoid sending it cleartext > > > [optional] > > > > > > > > 9. Add authentication to the embedded JNDI provider > > > > 10. Add authentication the administration API > > > > > > > > > If you (or anyone else for that matter) wants to do any of > > the above, > > > > please let me know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware > > > > With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a > > single machine. > > > > WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual > > machines at the > > > > same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > openjms-developer mailing list > > > > openjms-developer-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openjms-developer > > > > > > > > >