MOM replay management : OpenJMS MOM 0.7.5.

"Julien Schreiber" <julien.schreiber-JhP/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.openjms.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

Sorry if you have already received this mail. I just received a confirmation saying that I have joined successfully the Mailing list so I try to send it again...


Régis and I try to contact you for a problem occured on our OpenJMS MOM  0.7.5. 

Our problem is described below...

Below is also an answer Jima gave us a few monthes ago concerning performances of the MOM. He answered about JDBM database. Do you think our problem could be linked to this ? Do you think the configuration of the MOM is correct ?



Thanks in advance to give us some help or any answer prouving that this email reached someone successfully !!

Kind regards,


Julien Schreiber
Cap Gemini Telecom France




----- Original Message ----- 
From: Régis LEBRUN 
To: openjms-developer-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org 
Cc: Julien Schreiber 
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 5:06 PM
Subject: Fw: MOM replay management : OpenJMS MOM 0.7.5.


I received a mail error sending my email to my previews contacts on OpenJMS. I don't know why.

please find here after a brief description of our problem.
I hope you will be able to help us

Kind Regards
Régis Lebrun

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Régis LEBRUN 
To: tima-k+1zm/[email protected] ; [email protected] 
Cc: Julien Schreiber 
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 5:23 PM
Subject: MOM replay management : OpenJMS MOM 0.7.5.


Hi,

Julien, a guy working in my team sent you an email last week. As we didn't receive any news from you and as the problem is quite important (lost of messages), I wanted to bring you some precisions. Please, we need a quick answer.

The problem is systematically reproduced when we use a listener on another server (physical hardware implementation) than the MOM
It is not due to a huge traffic.

We use server A and server B.
If we install the MOM on server A and the listener in server B, we have the problem (100 messages lost for 54 000 messages sent at a frequency of 5 messages per second)
if we install the MOM on server A and the listener also, we never have the problem in hte same load configuration.

What we think l is that it can be a socket lost that is badly managed by the MOM.

Could you please have a look on that and give me a status.

Thank's a lot 

Regis Lebrun


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Julien Schreiber 
  To: tima-k+1zm/[email protected] ; [email protected] 
  Cc: Régis Lebrun 
  Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 1:52 PM
  Subject: MOM replay management


  Hi,

  I am currently using OpenJMS MOM 0.7.5.

  I have already asked some questions a few month ago that appear below.

  Here is my new question : I would like to know if it is possible to tune the MOM in order to try to send again messages that have not been transmitted correctly through the MOM. It seems that with the MOM I use, if too many messages are passed in the MOM at the same time, 2 kinds of problems can occur :
          - Messages are lost. No error messages or exception are caught that indicate that a problem occured. So everything seems to be done correctly from client side point of view.
          - Messages take 4 seconds to be transmitted through the MOM (it normally takes a few milliseconds when everything goes well). Once again, everything seems to be done correctly from client side point of view: Messages are "sent", and there is no information that prove that queues are saturated. 

  I have run load tests at 15 requests per second during a few minutes. The message passed is a String. A dozen requests are lost or take a few seconds to be transmitted through the MOM (4seconds in the MOM)

  Here above is the current configuration of the MOM :


  ************************************
  <?xml version="1.0"?>

  <!-- OpenJMS configuration:
       . TCP connectors  
       . JDBM persistency
       . embedded JNDI provider
       . preconfigured destinations
   -->

  <Configuration>

    <!-- Optional. This represents the default configuration  -->
    <ServerConfiguration host="172.28.20.131" embeddedJNDI="true" />
    
    <!-- Connector is TCP -->
    <Connectors>
      <Connector scheme="rmi">
        <ConnectionFactories>
          <QueueConnectionFactory name="JmsQueueConnectionFactory" />
        </ConnectionFactories>
      </Connector>
    </Connectors>
    
    <!-- Optional. This represents the default configuration  -->
    <!--
    <RmiConfiguration embeddedRegistry="true"
                      registryHost="172.28.20.131"
                      registryPort="1099"
                      clientPingInterval="15"
                      serverName="OpenJMSServer"
                      jndiName="JndiServer"
                      adminName="JmsAdminServer">
    </RmiConfiguration>
    -->
    
    
    <!-- Optional. This represents the default configuration  -->
    <!-- 
    <LeaseManagerConfiguration sleepTime="300" />
    -->
    <!-- Optional. This represents the default configuration  -->
    <!--
    <MessageManagerConfiguration destinationCacheSize="10000" />
    -->
    <!-- Optional. This represents the default configuration  -->
    <!--
    <SchedulerConfiguration maxThreads="10" />
    -->
    
    <!-- Optional.  -->
    <!--
    <GarbageCollectionConfiguration memoryCheckInterval="60"
                                    lowWaterThreshold="20"
                                    garbageCollectionInterval="120"
                                    garbageCollectionThreadPriority="5">
    </GarbageCollectionConfiguration>
    -->
    <!-- Required -->
    <!--
    <DatabaseConfiguration garbageCollectionInterval="600"
                           garbageCollectionBlockSize="500"
                           garbageCollectionThreadPriority="5">
    -->  
    <DatabaseConfiguration>
      <JdbmDatabaseConfiguration name="openjms.db" />
    </DatabaseConfiguration>
    
    <!-- Required -->
    <AdminConfiguration
       script="${openjms.home}/../../scripts/mom.sh -start"
       config="${openjms.home}/../MomServer.xml" />

    <!-- Optional. If not specified, no destinations will be created -->
    <AdministeredDestinations>
      <AdministeredQueue name="requestLocQueue" />
      <AdministeredQueue name="locResultQueueA" />
      <AdministeredQueue name="locResultQueueB" />
      <AdministeredQueue name="isAliveQueue" />
    </AdministeredDestinations>

  </Configuration>

  ************************************

  Thank in advance for your answer and tips to tune correctly the MOM

  Regards,


  Julien Schreiber 
  Cap Gemini Telecom France








    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Jim Alateras 
    To: 'Julien Schreiber' 
    Cc: 'alexis marchand' ; 'Régis Lebrun' 
    Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 12:12 AM
    Subject: RE: Problems with version 0.7.3.1 and 0.7.4


    JDBM database should not be used for load testing and is only distributed for quick out-of-the-box setup and testing. You should really choose one of RDBMS databases (i.e. mysql, hsql, oracle etc) for testing. With RDBMS we have been able to get 100's of messages per second (size of message 1KB).



    You should also be using 0.7.4 or wait for the latest version 0.7.5 to be released.



    If your persistent message requirements exceed 200x1KB messages/second then you may need to source a new JMS provider. However anything within the 200x1KB messages/second should be achievable with OpenJMS. 



    cheers

    </jima>



    -----Original Message-----
    From: Julien Schreiber [mailto:julien.schreiber-JhP/[email protected]] 
    Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 11:24 PM
    To: jima-k+1zm/[email protected]
    Cc: alexis marchand; Régis Lebrun
    Subject: Problems with version 0.7.3.1 and 0.7.4



    Hi,



    We have tried to use the new version of the OpenJMS MOM : 0.7.4 on Solaris.



    Performances are not as good as it was with version 0.7.3.1 : Processing Time is longer than before. 





    We have run a test with a frequency of 3 messages sent in the MOM per second.



    Here is the configuration we used :



    ***********************************************************************************************************************************



    <?xml version="1.0"?>



    <!-- OpenJMS configuration:
         . TCP connectors  
         . JDBM persistency
         . embedded JNDI provider
         . preconfigured destinations
     -->



    <Configuration>



      <!-- Optional. This represents the default configuration  -->
      <ServerConfiguration host="10.67.178.28" embeddedJNDI="true" />
      
      <!-- Connector is TCP -->
      <Connectors>
        <Connector scheme="rmi">
          <ConnectionFactories>
            <QueueConnectionFactory name="JmsQueueConnectionFactory" />
          </ConnectionFactories>
        </Connector>
      </Connectors>
      
      
      <!-- Optional. This represents the default configuration  -->
      <LeaseManagerConfiguration sleepTime="300" />



      <!-- Optional. This represents the default configuration  -->
      <MessageManagerConfiguration destinationCacheSize="10" />



      <!-- Optional. This represents the default configuration  -->
      <SchedulerConfiguration maxThreads="10" />



      <!-- Optional.  -->
      <GarbageCollectionConfiguration memoryCheckInterval="60"
                                      lowWaterThreshold="20"
                                      garbageCollectionInterval="120"
                                      garbageCollectionThreadPriority="5">
      </GarbageCollectionConfiguration>




      
      <!-- Required -->
      <DatabaseConfiguration>
        <JdbmDatabaseConfiguration name="openjms.db" />
      </DatabaseConfiguration>




      <!-- Required -->
      <AdminConfiguration
         script="${openjms.home}/../../scripts/mom.sh -start"
         config="${openjms.home}/../MomServer.xml" />



      <!-- Optional. If not specified, no destinations will be created -->
      <AdministeredDestinations>
        <AdministeredQueue name="requestLocQueue" />
        <AdministeredQueue name="locResultQueueA" />
        <AdministeredQueue name="locResultQueueB" />
        <AdministeredQueue name="isAliveQueue" />
      </AdministeredDestinations>



    </Configuration>



    ***********************************************************************************************************************************





    We had also endurance problems with version 0.7.3.1



    Here is the error messages we had during a Load Test with a frequency of 5 messages sent in the MOM per second. Error occured 1 hour after the begining of the Test : 





    ***********************************************************************************************************************************

    13:49:51.636 ERROR [Scheduler-Worker-3] - Dropping handle Handle : 0:1048427372219:1494979:ID:15591976861184663 since we cannot resolve it.
    13:49:51.652 ERROR [Scheduler-Worker-3] - javax.jms.JMSException: Could not get message for handle Handle : 0:1048427372219:1494979:ID:15591976861184663
    javax.jms.JMSException: Could not get message for handle Handle : 0:1048427372219:1494979:ID:15591976861184663
            at org.exolab.jms.server.JmsServerSession.onMessage(Unknown Source)
            at org.exolab.jms.messagemgr.QueueConsumerEndpoint.run(Unknown Source)
            at org.exolab.core.threadPool.ThreadPoolWorker.runIt(Unknown Source)
            at org.exolab.core.threadPool.ThreadPoolWorker.runWork(Unknown Source)
            at org.exolab.core.threadPool.ThreadPoolWorker.access$000(Unknown Source)
            at org.exolab.core.threadPool.ThreadPoolWorker$1.run(Unknown Source)
            at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479)
    15:23:51.466 ERROR [Scheduler-Worker-4] - Dropping handle Handle : 0:1048433014999:1548927:ID:7739832439311948131 since we cannot resolve it.
    15:23:51.467 ERROR [Scheduler-Worker-4] - javax.jms.JMSException: Could not get message for handle Handle : 0:1048433014999:1548927:ID:7739832439311948131
    javax.jms.JMSException: Could not get message for handle Handle : 0:1048433014999:1548927:ID:7739832439311948131
            at org.exolab.jms.server.JmsServerSession.onMessage(Unknown Source)
            at org.exolab.jms.messagemgr.QueueConsumerEndpoint.run(Unknown Source)
            at org.exolab.core.threadPool.ThreadPoolWorker.runIt(Unknown Source)
            at org.exolab.core.threadPool.ThreadPoolWorker.runWork(Unknown Source)
            at org.exolab.core.threadPool.ThreadPoolWorker.access$000(Unknown Source)
            at org.exolab.core.threadPool.ThreadPoolWorker$1.run(Unknown Source)
            at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479)
    02:09:59.757 ERROR [Scheduler-Worker-7] - Dropping handle Handle : 0:1048471796879:1919720:ID:6589455389744779712 since we cannot resolve it.
    02:09:59.758 ERROR [Scheduler-Worker-7] - javax.jms.JMSException: Could not get message for handle Handle : 0:1048471796879:1919720:ID:6589455389744779712
    javax.jms.JMSException: Could not get message for handle Handle : 0:1048471796879:1919720:ID:6589455389744779712
            at org.exolab.jms.server.JmsServerSession.onMessage(Unknown Source)
            at org.exolab.jms.messagemgr.QueueConsumerEndpoint.run(Unknown Source)
            at org.exolab.core.threadPool.ThreadPoolWorker.runIt(Unknown Source)
            at org.exolab.core.threadPool.ThreadPoolWorker.runWork(Unknown Source)
            at org.exolab.core.threadPool.ThreadPoolWorker.access$000(Unknown Source)
            at org.exolab.core.threadPool.ThreadPoolWorker$1.run(Unknown Source)
            at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479)



    ***********************************************************************************************************************************



    Here is the configuration we used :



    ***********************************************************************************************************************************



    <?xml version="1.0"?>



    <!-- OpenJMS configuration:
         . TCP connectors  
         . JDBM persistency
         . embedded JNDI provider
         . preconfigured destinations
     -->



    <Configuration>



      <!-- Optional. This represents the default configuration  -->
      <ServerConfiguration host="10.67.178.28" embeddedJNDI="true" />
      
      <!-- Connector is TCP -->
      <Connectors>
        <Connector scheme="rmi">
          <ConnectionFactories>
            <QueueConnectionFactory name="JmsQueueConnectionFactory" />
          </ConnectionFactories>
        </Connector>
      </Connectors>
      
      
      <!-- Optional. This represents the default configuration  -->
      <LeaseManagerConfiguration sleepTime="300" />



      <!-- Optional. This represents the default configuration  -->
      <MessageManagerConfiguration destinationCacheSize="10" />



      <!-- Optional. This represents the default configuration  -->
      <SchedulerConfiguration maxThreads="10" />



      <!-- Optional.  -->
      <GarbageCollectionConfiguration memoryCheckInterval="60"
                                      lowWaterThreshold="20"
                                      garbageCollectionInterval="120"
                                      garbageCollectionThreadPriority="5">
      </GarbageCollectionConfiguration>




      
      <!-- Required -->
      <DatabaseConfiguration>
        <JdbmDatabaseConfiguration name="openjms.db" />
      </DatabaseConfiguration>




      <!-- Required -->
      <AdminConfiguration
         script="${openjms.home}/../../scripts/mom.sh -start"
         config="${openjms.home}/../MomServer.xml" />



      <!-- Optional. If not specified, no destinations will be created -->
      <AdministeredDestinations>
        <AdministeredQueue name="requestLocQueue" />
        <AdministeredQueue name="locResultQueueA" />
        <AdministeredQueue name="locResultQueueB" />
        <AdministeredQueue name="isAliveQueue" />
      </AdministeredDestinations>



    </Configuration>



    ***********************************************************************************************************************************



    Could you tell us if the configuration we use could be appplied to the 2 versions ? Could you give us some tips to customize the MOM to increase performances and endurance ? Could you give us some information on changes between the 2 versions explaining the bad performances we saw while running the Test ?



    We have 3 days to find a solution regarding both the load performances and the endurance of the MOM. 



    Then we will have to change the OpenJMS MOM to another one.





    Regards,





    ___________________________ 
    Julien Schreiber 
    Cap Gemini Telecom Media & Networks 
    +33 (0)1 49 00 47 60 



___________________________ 
Julien Schreiber 
Cap Gemini Telecom Media & Networks 
+33 (0)1 49 00 47 60 
___________________________ 
Julien Schreiber 
Cap Gemini Telecom Media & Networks 
+33 (0)1 49 00 47 60
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.