Re: OpenJMS Scalability
"R.F. Pels" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.openjms.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Friday 16 September 2005 20.06, Steve Angelovich wrote: > We have a distributed java application that does a lot of scientific > computations on a Linux cluster. In our environment we may start a job > that runs on 16 or 32 nodes and may run for several days before > completing. The decomposition is pretty simple so there typically isn't > a lot of node to node communication required once the initialization > gets completed. However there are cases where a node will query all > the other nodes. A simple example would be to find out their status. I'm unsure if 1000+ clients scales well. But wouldn't you in this case better consider multicasting? As a matter of fact, I'm investigating into Mule. It can use MOM if you want to, but you're not restricted to it. -- R.F. Pels, 3e Rompert 118, 5233 AL 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands +31736414590 [email protected] http://home.tiscali.nl/~ruurd ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php