Re: Making detaching the default behaviour

Anthony & Melissa Berglas <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.orm.simpleorm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I like your idea of a detach all records 
method.  It also avoids the issues of partial 
detachment, where children are detached but not parents.

Anthony

At 07:46 PM 04-02-08, Franck Routier wrote:

>Hi Anthony,
>
>in my app, I tend to always detach records, to display and update them
>in the presentation layer. I also detach them to handle business rules
>in the business layer. Cases where I read / udpate / commit from within
>a single Simpleorm transaction are ... well, I don't have such case
>until now :) And I have been beaten by the destroy behaviour in methods
>that were only querying data, where I would detach the main record, but
>not the one implicitely attached to the transaction because they were
>references.
>
>But I understand your argument. Maybe I could add a method to
>SConnection to detach all records, leaving the default behaviour to
>destroying, but giving one stop choice for those of the detaching kind
>like me.
>
>Don't know if somebody else has an opinion on the subject ?
>
>Franck
>
>Le dimanche 03 février 2008 à 19:50 +1000, Anthony & Melissa Berglas a
>écrit :
> > Simply that accessing records after a commit is probably a
> > bug. Updates to the records will not be reflected in the
> > database. So the symptoms could be obscure and nasty. I do prefer
> > the explicit detach.
> >
> > Anthony
> >
> > At 08:27 PM 29-01-08, Franck Routier wrote:
> >
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >I am considering making detaching the records from the connection the
> > >default behaviour, instead of destroying them, when
> > committing/closing
> > >the connection.
> > >
> > >But I am eager to understand why destroying the records was the
> > default
> > >behaviour in the first place... Any enlightenmnet on this ?
> > >
> > >Thanks,
> > >Franck
> > >
> > >
> >
> > EMail: 
> <mailto:berglas%40spreadsheetdetective.com>[email protected]
> >
> > +61 7 3369 4065 (Australian Eastern Standard Time)
> >
> > If the model seems correct only because the numbers look right,
> > then why build the model in the first place?
> >
> >
> >
> >
>--
>Franck Routier
>Axège Sarl - 23, rue Saint-Simon, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand (FR)
>Tél : +33 463 059 540
>mèl : <mailto:franck.routier%40axege.com>[email protected]
>
>

EMail: [email protected]

+61 7 3369 4065 (Australian Eastern Standard Time)

If the model seems correct only because the numbers look right,
then why build the model in the first place?



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SimpleORM/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:[email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.