Re: self()

A bit overkill actually. You do not need to replace this with self() if when 
you are using this to determine the scope but only when used as a parameter 
representing the object instance. Something like the following will be easier 
to read:

   public void setBank(java.lang.String accountNumber,
          se.snigel.ozone.Bank bank) {
          if (bank != null) &&
                  bank.getBankAccounts().containsKey
 (accountNumber)) {
              bank.getBankAccounts().remove(accountNumber);
          }

          this.bank = bank;

          if ((bank != null) &&
                  !this.equals(bank.getBankAccounts().get(accountNumber))) {
              bank.getBankAccounts().put(accountNumber, self());
          }
      }

Regards,
Per

Wednesday 29 June 2005 02.02 skrev Karl Wettin:
> I'm not quite sure on how much I should use self(). For now I use it
> everywhere. Is that crazy or just about right?
>
>
>   public void setBank(java.lang.String accountNumber,
>          se.snigel.ozone.Bank bank) {
>          if ((self().bank != null) &&
>                  self().bank.getBankAccounts().containsKey
> (accountNumber)) {
>              self().bank.getBankAccounts().remove(accountNumber);
>          }
>
>          self().bank = bank;
>
>          if ((bank != null) &&
>                  !self().equals(bank.getBankAccounts().get
> (accountNumber))) {
>              bank.getBankAccounts().put(accountNumber, self());
>          }
>      }


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click