Re: Object is not (yet) associated to a database container

On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 14:10, Sunil Goyal wrote:
> Hello Leo,
> 
> I was getting the error because I was constructing
> ozone objects just using a constructor.
> 
> public class FooImpl extends OzoneObject implements OzoneRemote {
> 
>      private Object o;
>      public FooImpl() {
>         o = new Object();
>      }
> }
> 
> This doesn't gave me error.
> 
> Even when I try to create an object
> new FooImpl() , this is ok .

No, it's not :-)

You cannot create an ozone object and then try to store it in the
database; you can only create an object in the database.

In the real world this means that you should never construct an ozone
object yourself (by calling the constructor); you should always go
through database() or the factory method on a proxy or a factory class'
create() method.

Cheers,
Leo




-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click