Re: Object is not (yet) associated to a database container

Hi
>> Even when I try to create an object
>> new FooImpl() , this is ok .
>
> No, it's not :-)

You are right. I wrote rather quickly, I mean't it to be ok
in another context, in a sense I don't get an exception -
when I try to do it.

But one won't be able to store it, as later on when you try to access
it results in errors.

Regards
Sunil

> You cannot create an ozone object and then try to store it in the
> database; you can only create an object in the database.
>
> In the real world this means that you should never construct an ozone
> object yourself (by calling the constructor); you should always go
> through database() or the factory method on a proxy or a factory class'
> create() method.
>
> Cheers,
> Leo
>
>



-- 
=====================================================================
Sunil Goyal
New Media Lab
Salzburg Research Forschungsgesellschft m.b.H.
Jakob Haringer-Strasse 5/III | A-5020 Salzburg
T: +43.662.2288-414 | F: +43.662.2288-222
[email protected]
http://www.salzburgresearch.at
======================================================================


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click