Re: transactions

While I think using external transactions is overkill in this situation
(and use of external transactions should be avoided if not explicitly
needed, implicit transactions are better and produce better readable
code), I cannot see any reason why this would go wrong.

Maybe one of the other people on this list?

Cheers,
Leo

On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 16:37, Sunil Goyal wrote:
> Hello leo,
> 
> Thanks for sorting out some of the issues. Finally
> I have been able to run some code of my application:-)
> 
> But one more issue still there :-)
> I am getting a stack overflow in a particular case.
>       [java] got local db
>       [java] WARN   [main] Transaction - ta[id=5102,blocker=null]: uncaught 
> exception: (java.lang.StackOverflowError)
>       [java] java.lang.StackOverflowError
>       [java] WARN   [main] Transaction - ta[id=5102,blocker=null]: uncaught 
> exception: (java.lang.StackOverflowError)
>       [java] java.lang.StackOverflowError
>       [java] java.lang.StackOverflowError
>       [java]     at 
> org.ozoneDB.ExternalDatabase.sendCommand(ExternalDatabase.java:536)
>       [java]     at 
> org.ozoneDB.ExternalDatabase.sendCommand(ExternalDatabase.java:485)
>       [java]     at 
> org.ozoneDB.ExternalDatabase.objectForName(ExternalDatabase.java:760)
>       [java]     at 
> org.cultos.ozstorage.mdwb.kdb.MdwbEmmoStorage.getRootEmmo(MdwbEmmoStorage.java:158)
> 
> 
> 
> I am creating a LocalDatabase , putting an object and rertieving that 
> object.
> 
> LocalDatabase db1;
> db1.open("/path/db");
> ExternalTransaction tr1 = db1.newTransaction();
> tr1.begin();
> Foo foo1 = (Foo)db1.createObject(FooImpl.class.getName(),0,"foo");
> foo1.setName("Foo 1");  // some operation on foo1
> 
> tr1.commit();
> db1.close();    // step_middle_1
> 
> db1.open("/path/db");   // step_middle_2
> ExternalTransaction tr2  = db1.newTransaction();
> tr2.begin();
> foo1 = (Foo)db1.objectForName("foo");  // get an error here..., stack 
> overflow
> System.out.println(foo1.getName());  // some operation of foo1
> tr2.commit();
> db1.close();
> 
> 
> Now suppose if I  don't close or open the database in between
> (step_middle_1 and step_middle_2) and just commit and open another
> transaction, then things are fine.
> 
> FooImpl and Foo are the classes with the defined Ozone interfaces
> for getting proxies.
> 
> Am I missing or doing something wrong over here in the
> code above? Thanks in advance. This is the last one for the day!!
> 
> Regards
> Sunil



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click