Re: nameObject performance
Thomas Dingler <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:45:48 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.ozone.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, thanks for the info!! Is there a way to remove the names from the objects in a existing database? Maybe "nameObject(myObj, null)" ? Cheers, Thomas Am 10.12.2004 um 00:02 schrieb Wieslaw Faruga: > Hi, > > It is not a good idea to naming all objects in a database. > 1. You should keep these objects reachable using a native java > collections (small amount of objects) or ozone aware collections. > 2. Your database should be a tree of ozone objects with only one named > object (root / entry point). > > Ozone object naming system is based on standard (memory based) java > collection, thus the server will crash if you create a large number of > named objects. > > Cheers, > Wieslaw > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real > users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Ozone-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ozone-users -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.1 iQA/AwUBQb25MLn0SLup8M1VEQJMHQCfQQ6cOW3Hcb1uCWHy9iI1FikCV2wAn329 zuMYIdn5ty6QGTiwmFAF69A9 =yI72 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/