[picocontainer-scm] [jira] (PICO-386) Component resolution should respect scope from which it was resolved
"Michael Rimov (JIRA)" <jira-yCVjj/[email protected]> Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:24:02 -0600 (CST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.cvs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1540117446.25533.1327526642921.JavaMail.j2ee-jira@codehaus01.managed.contegix.com> |
[ https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PICO-386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=289680#comment-289680 ]
Michael Rimov commented on PICO-386:
------------------------------------
I understand what you're saying in the example you gave, but right now it isn't possible to do what you describe. That said, I've often thought about how nice it would be to have that feature. You're right that AFAICT, it would be very code invasive, which is why I haven't tried to brave it for that kind of feature.
Paul or others? Any thoughts?
> Component resolution should respect scope from which it was resolved
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PICO-386
> URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PICO-386
> Project: PicoContainer
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: PicoContainer (Java)
> Affects Versions: 2.14.1
> Reporter: Rikard Pavelic
> Assignee: Paul Hammant
>
> I've encountered behavior which looks like a bug to me, but this is maybe by design. I'm not really fluent in Java so I'll write example in Scala. Hope that's ok.
> class A(b: B)
> class B(name: String)
> val container = new DefaultPicoContainer
> container.addComponent(classOf[A])
> container.addComponent(new B("root"))
> val scope = container.makeChildContainer
> scope.addComponent(new B("child"))
> val a = scope.getComponent(classOf[A])
> expected: a.b.name = "child"
> actual: a.b.name = "root"
> It seems that Pico doesn't respect full dependency path when resolving components registered in parent container. It resolves component based on registration path, not resolution path. This makes it unusable for chaining state and overriding non-trivial components.
> I suspect that this change will probably be code invasive, so before I take a better look at what Pico is doing I'm just wondering if you are interested in this behavior, did you try to implement it, but it was to complex, or any other info.
> Thanks,
> Rikard
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
<hr/>
<p>
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email">http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email</a>
</p>