Re: [picocontainer-dev] Branches created for released components and m2 support

--- Mauro Talevi <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi folks,
> 
> I've created branches for the released Pico/Nano
> components.
> 
>
https://svn.codehaus.org/picocontainer/java/picocontainer/branches/picocontainer-1_2
>
https://svn.codehaus.org/picocontainer/java/nanocontainer/branches/nanocontainer-1_0
>
https://svn.codehaus.org/picocontainer/java/nanocontainer-nanowar/branches/nanocontainer-nanowar-1_0
>
https://svn.codehaus.org/picocontainer/java/nanocontainer-persistence/branches/nanocontainer-persistence-1_0
> 
> These can be used for bugfix and maintainance
> releases.
> 
> The first of these should be to support m2 properly.
> 
> We now have an m2-compatible Codehaus repository
> http://repository.codehaus.org
> 
> I would like to release Pico/Nano to m2 repo and
> bump up the version to 1.2.1 and 1.0.1
> to avoid possible conflicts - even though they are
> only POM changes and no "code" changes.
> I'm aware that we'd be using different groupIds but
> using different versions would make it
> easier to tag in svn and trace changes.
> 
> Thoughts?
Could you hold nanowar a little ( today and tomorrow )

I found some problems with WW2 integration which I
would like to fix first. 
( I know, WW folks take over this code, but now
thare is problem with pico object factory and their
released code ) 
regards,

----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]----------------
Still using XDoclet 1.x?  XDoclet 2 is released and of production quality.
check it out: http://xdoclet.codehaus.org

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com