RE: [picocontainer-dev] Request: Add public getParameters() to ComponentAdapter interface.

> IMHO this was suggested before and rejected ... but honestly - I don't
> remember why. Parameter is part of the core API and therefore we don't
> introduce some unwanted dependency to o.p.d to o.p. Regarding security it
> depends on the question, if a Parameter might be tweaked ... but again, I
> see no real issue with it. Parameter is a read-only interface and a
> ComponentAdapter is not available from within the components.
> 
> So I have no real argument for rejecting this proposal. Did I miss
> anything?

I was thinking about what you said and I realize this move probably wouldn't
be the best move anyway.  I still think that container writing would be a
desirable thing, but having a RecordableNanoContainer that decorates
NanoContainer would preserve the Opaqueness of PicoContainer yet provide
writing capabilities would be much more desirable.


Thanks for the critique!
					-Mike