Re: [picocontainer-dev] FW: [picocontainer] [3121] java/nanocontainer-nanowar/trunk: Split nanowar into core and separate modules for each framework supported.

Konstantin Priblouda <kpriblouda-/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
As for WW2, pico integration was moved ( donated? )
to ww project itself, though it did not made it to
struts 2 due to license headers...

I personally feel that this integration belongs 
there (somehow).

regards,

--- Jörg Schaible <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Well, it seems we're back were we started ....
> 
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: mauro-yCVjj/[email protected] [mailto:mauro-yCVjj/[email protected]]
> 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 2:20 PM
> To: scm-qxt/[email protected]
> Subject: [picocontainer-scm] [picocontainer] [3121]
> java/nanocontainer-nanowar/trunk: Split nanowar into
> core and separate modules for each framework
> supported.
> 
> 
> 
> 	Revision 
> 	3121
>
<http://fisheye.codehaus.org/changelog/picocontainer/?cs=3121>
>  
> 	Author 
> 	mauro 
> 	Date 
> 	2006-12-19 07:19:22 -0600 (Tue, 19 Dec 2006) 
> 
> 
> Log Message
> 
> Split nanowar into core and separate modules for
> each framework supported.
> 
>  [snip] 
> 
> 


----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]----------------
Still using XDoclet 1.x?  XDoclet 2 is released and of production quality.
check it out: http://xdoclet.codehaus.org

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.