Re: [picocontainer-dev] NanoPersistence Splitting. A 2 part proposal.

Michael Rimov wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> Well, with some investigating, I'd like to propose that we split 
> Nano-persistence into multiple projects for the same reason we split 
> NanoWAR:
> 
> Hibernate 3.0 and Hibernate 3.2 have different Session and 
> SessionFactory interfaces.
> 
> So part one of this is splitting the persistence into Hibernate 3.0 and 
> 3.2.
> 
> Now part 2:
> 
> I'm only really needing Hibernate 3.2 for the JPA annotations.  To that 
> end I will be creating a ConstructableAnnotationConfig object.
> 
> My question is: Could I take the lazy route and make the Hibernate 3.2 
> module require Jdk 1.5 so I could include the annotation config with 
> it?  We'd still keep the current JDK requirements the same for the 
> Hibernate 3, Hibernate 2, and JDBC persistence code.
> 


I would opt for a nanopersistence-jpa module with the impl of the JPA (eg hibernate 3.2) pluggable.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email