Re: [picocontainer-dev] Nanowar filter chains

Konstantin Priblouda wrote:
> Hi all, 
> 
> I just discovered that current aproach in chain filter
> ( forward request ) is not going to work with WW2 / S2
> ,
> because pereferred way to dispatch to actions is nov
> entirely via filter, so only static pages are possible
> ( not much fun - there must be logic somewhere to
> decide
> where to divert ) 
> 
> However, I tried to wrap request that it returns other
> servlet path and pass it down the chain - it worked. 
> 
> Would it be too dangerous / not acceptable for other
> containers than tomcat? ( it works with TC / JB ) 
> 
> And while the main puprose of diverting to action vas
> to provide logic to choose where to redirect based on 
> cause of failure in chain, this logic could be
> provided 
> by other means.
> 
> Say - filter may lookup "divertor"-Component (
> configurable key / class, instantiate via  container -
> 
> we have one ) which tells him where to go further. 
> 
> WDYT?

Not sure I understand.  You saying your fix *only* works for Tomcat/JBoss?

I don't really use filter chains, but if you have a filter implementation that does the trick with 
Struts2, then perhaps it should be added to a nanowar-struts2 component.

BTW, what happened to the whole issue of the migration of WW2 code to S2 codebase?

Cheers


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email