Re: [picocontainer-dev] current build of pico container
Mauro Talevi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have to state that the current M2 build is really a little mess. First of all I introduced a pom.xml to build all modules at once (at leats the ones converted to M2). Then I detected that most of the SCM URLs were wrongly set to a tag URL. The microcontainer deps did not use existing versions. pico-gems could not even be build with JDK
1.4. Now the overall build fails in NanoContainer Core, since the XMLContainerBuilderTestCase
references classes in nano-testmodel that are not available in the repo! Paul, you've been blamed ;-)
>
> 34 3397 21.05.2007 08:07:28 paul import org.nanocontainer.testmodel.ListSupport;
> 35 3397 21.05.2007 08:07:28 paul import org.nanocontainer.testmodel.MapSupport;
>
> CI is really necessary ...
>
Let's get it up a running.
CruiseControl does not allow a good remote management. It does a pretty good job if you have
complete control of the CI machine - which we don't have.
Bamboo has been designed to support remote management.
I vote for Bamboo unless we have someone ready to volunteer a machine to run CC on.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email