RE: Re: [picocontainer-dev] current build of pico container

Paul .... where are the classes ?? We can no longer build the trunk!!


Mauro Talevi wrote on Tuesday, May 22, 2007 2:13 PM:

> Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>> 
>> I have to state that the current M2 build is really a
> little mess. First of all I introduced a pom.xml to build all
> modules at once (at leats the ones converted to M2). Then I
> detected that most of the SCM URLs were wrongly set to a tag
> URL. The microcontainer deps did not use existing versions.
> pico-gems could not even be build with JDK
> 1.4. Now the overall build fails in NanoContainer Core, since
> the XMLContainerBuilderTestCase
> references classes in nano-testmodel that are not available
> in the repo! Paul, you've been blamed ;-)
>> 
>>     34   3397            21.05.2007 08:07:28 paul
>                 import org.nanocontainer.testmodel.ListSupport;
>>     35   3397            21.05.2007 08:07:28 paul
>                 import org.nanocontainer.testmodel.MapSupport;
>> 
>> CI is really necessary ...
>> 
> 
> Let's get it up a running.
> 
> CruiseControl does not allow a good remote management.  It
> does a pretty good job if you have
> complete control of the CI machine - which we don't have.
> 
> Bamboo has been designed to support remote management.
> 
> I vote for Bamboo unless we have someone ready to volunteer a machine
> to run CC on. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
> 
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email