Re: [picocontainer-dev] caf chaining in builder (done)

I might still change to camelCase() :-) , but I don't think I'm going  
to do an enum -

One new interface (a Factory to a Factory) feels wrong, plus there is  
no room for flair when it comes to have a variable argument list for  
the ctor of the more sophisticated variations like the JMX one.

The static-wildcard import is still possible.

- Paul

On May 29, 2007, at 9:15 AM, Putrycz, Erik wrote:

> I would suggest making all the static methods into enum.
> Something like
> interface CAFBuilder {
>    public ComponentAdapterFactory createComponentAdapterFactory();
> }
> enum Builders implements CAFBuilder {
>
>     SDI() {
> 	public ComponentAdapterFactory createComponentAdapterFactory() {
> 		return new SetterInjectionComponentAdapterFactory();
> 	}
>     }
>     ...
> }
>
> This way if you do an
> import static ...Builders.*;
>
> you can write
>
> MutablePicoContainer mpc = new PicoBuilder
> ().withComponentAdapterFactories(Caching, Impl_Hiding, SDI
> ()).build()
>
> I personnaly don't like so much the all uppercase for the builder.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email