Re: [picocontainer-dev] annotations and comments on Pico2

--- Philipp Meier <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think adding a dependency on the container is bad,
> too. Using 
> annotations to model component dependencies is
> usefull in some cases. So 
> I suggest creating annotation types like "Inject" or
> "Singleton" or 
> "ThreadLocal" in the domain model and let pico
> provide a simple api/spi 
> to make us of this annotations.

This is even less cool ;)  First pico has to 
determine whoch annotations to take, and compile time
binding is uncool anyway - it hat to be overriden 
at runtime and thus useless. 

Decision how to wire components is out of scope of
domain model. 



> Using annotations to wire components together is
> often fine. Using 
> annotations for configuration is mostly bad. (my two
> cents).

Wiring components together is configuration of
application.

regards,

----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]----------------
JTec quality components: http://www.pribluda.de/projects/


       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
http://sims.yahoo.com/  

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email