Re: [picocontainer-dev] Pico2: Changing MPC to PC, and dropping old PC for an immutable version of former MPC
Paul Hammant <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yeah am going to leave be.
-ph
On Jun 7, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Mauro Talevi wrote:
> Paul Hammant wrote:
>> I've been at it for a week or so and I've nearly completed it. It
>> leaves a sour taste in my mouth, after much sweat.
>> Wrapping an MPC in a PicoContainer-only proxy was a way of
>> signally the constructor of DftPicoContainer that this was the
>> parent container.
>> Now both its going the parent wrapper is going to be a old MPC
>> too. ( instanceof PicoContainer && ! (instanceof
>> ImmutablePicoContainer) ) feels wrong. That last with the new names.
>> I'm think the current ways is best. Meaning I revert my change
>> and go with the old idea of - MPC renamed to PC and PC renamed to
>> SomethingElse.
>> If yes, what should that something else be called ?
>> And, sorry for eternally coming back to this!
>> Thoughts?
>
> I would separate the two issues - leave aside the renames until
> there is consensus on the names.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email