Re: [picocontainer-dev] Pico2: Changing MPC to PC, and dropping old PC for an immutable version of former MPC

Paul Hammant <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Yeah am going to leave be.

-ph

On Jun 7, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Mauro Talevi wrote:

> Paul Hammant wrote:
>> I've been at it for a week or so and I've nearly completed it. It  
>> leaves a sour taste in my mouth, after much sweat.
>> Wrapping an MPC in a PicoContainer-only proxy was a way of  
>> signally the constructor of DftPicoContainer that this was the  
>> parent container.
>> Now both its going the parent wrapper is going to be a old MPC  
>> too.  ( instanceof PicoContainer && ! (instanceof  
>> ImmutablePicoContainer) ) feels wrong. That last with the new names.
>> I'm think the current ways is best.  Meaning I revert my change  
>> and go with the old idea of - MPC renamed to PC and PC renamed to  
>> SomethingElse.
>> If yes, what should that something else be called ?
>> And, sorry for eternally coming back to this!
>> Thoughts?
>
> I would separate the two issues - leave aside the renames until  
> there is consensus on the names.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>
>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.