Re: [picocontainer-dev] renames ..

Paul Hammant wrote:
> I really like the NLP style naming thats been introduced with Pico2.
> 
> I'd like to take it a stage further .....
> 
>   CachingBehaviorFactory becomes Caching
>   CachingBehavior becomes Cached
> 
>   ImplementationHidingBehaviorFactory becomes ImplementationHiding
>   ImplementationHidingBehavior becomes HiddenImplementation
> 
>   PoolingBehaviorFactory becomes Pooling
>   PoolingBehavior becomes Pooled
> 
> 
>   etc.
> 
> Rationale?
> 
> All the BehaviorFactory implementations had the work 'ing' before 
> BehaviorFactory.
> 
> The simple 'ed' and 'ing' naming is quite purposeful, and may allow us 
> to kill off the 'Behaviors' class

How so?  Not clear how that would make a difference.

> 
> Thoughts?
> 

Don't really understand the rationale nor the benefits.

The risk once again is of becoming too cryptic in naming.  If you have an interface X an impl YyyyX 
is quite self-evident, while an impl Z is less so.

Cheers


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email