Re: [picocontainer-dev] Pushing/Pushy - standard hammant naming blues.
Konstantin Priblouda <kpriblouda-/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- Paul Hammant <[email protected]> wrote: > I've been off to thesaurus.com looking for one word > adjective, or two > word phrase ( > http://thesaurus.reference.com/browse/pushing ) > that's > equiv to: > > component that will instantiate even though it is > not depended on > anything that is going to be looked-up from the > container, nor is it > looked-up itself. > > Any thoughts? With your explanation it starts making sense for me ;) ( as non-native english speaker I'm not that good in proposing names, but what about "eager" ? ) regards, ----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]---------------- JTec quality components: http://www.pribluda.de/projects/ ____________________________________________________________________________________ Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/222 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email