RE: [picocontainer-dev] Pushing/Pushy - standard hammant naming blues.

What about AutoStartable/AutoStarting or AutoInstantiatable/AutoInstantiating or AutoLife/AutoLiving?

Paul Hammant wrote on Thursday, August 09, 2007 9:01 AM:

> eager, pushy and selfish are perhaps just too-short euphamisms for
> 
>    'always instantiate'
> 
> AlwaysInstantiate.java might be what this should be. It unambiguous,
> though not snappy. 
> 
> - Paul
> 
> On Aug 8, 2007, at 11:14 AM, Konstantin Priblouda wrote:
> 
>> 
>> --- Paul Hammant <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> I've been off to thesaurus.com looking for one word adjective, or
>>> two word phrase (
>>> http://thesaurus.reference.com/browse/pushing )
>>> that's
>>> equiv to:
>>> 
>>>    component that will instantiate even though it is not depended on
>>> anything that is going to be looked-up from the
>>> container, nor is it
>>> looked-up itself.
>>> 
>>> Any thoughts?
>> 
>> With your explanation it starts making sense for me ;)
>> 
>> ( as non-native english speaker  I'm not that good in
>> proposing names, but what about "eager" ? )
>> 
>> regards,
>> 
>> 
>> ----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]----------------
>> JTec quality components: http://www.pribluda.de/projects/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> ________
>> ______________
>> Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's
>> Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when.
>> http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/222
>> 
>> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>> 
>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
> 
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email