Re: [picocontainer-dev] Argumentative PC
Paul Hammant <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> As both jmx and jndi are now in JRE it could be in
> core
> ( does not introduce any stray dependency )
>
I no like though - don't want to encourage people to use jndi :-)
> Otherwise we will have 2 new nano subprojects -
> nano-jndi & nano-jmx with only 2-3 classes each.
>
> I think I will do this in 2.x first, and then
> backport to 1.x ( is new release planned? )
>
We could imagine a Pico 1.9 that leverages Backport or Retroweaver.
Depends n how far we've gone with generics and special libraries in 2.x
- Paul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email