RE: [picocontainer-dev] Argumentative PC

Paul Hammant wrote on Thursday, August 09, 2007 4:49 PM:

>> As both jmx and jndi are now in JRE it could be in
>> core
>> ( does not introduce any stray dependency )
>> 
> 
> I no like though - don't want to encourage people to use jndi :-)
> 
>> Otherwise we will have 2 new nano subprojects -
>> nano-jndi & nano-jmx with only 2-3 classes each.
>> 
>> I think I will do this in 2.x first, and then
>> backport to 1.x ( is new release planned? )
>> 
> 
> We could imagine a Pico 1.9 that leverages Backport or Retroweaver.
> Depends n how far we've gone with generics and special
> libraries in 2.x

It should stay under any circumstance Pico-2.x ... but with classifier:

pico-2.x-retro.jar 

;-)

- Jörg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email