Re: [picocontainer-dev] Storing Cached items in HttpSession?

I think so, yes.

- Paul

On Aug 12, 2007, at 1:41 PM, Jacob Kjome wrote:

>
> Will this new code avoid the issue of serializing the app container  
> along with the session container while still allowing the app  
> container to be the session container's parent?  I haven't looked  
> at nanowar in quite a while, but I don't think this issue was ever  
> cleanly resolved.  If you put non-serializable objects in the app  
> container and the session container is serialized, deserialization  
> will fail because of the non-serializable objects in the app  
> container.
>
> Jake
>
> At 10:09 AM 8/12/2007, you wrote:
> >
> >--- Paul Hammant <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> For a session container (web app), can we store the
> >> Cached items in
> >> the HttpSession?  I mean as an alternative to
> >> storing the whole
> >> container in the session ?
> >
> >session container shall be available on session anyway
> >-
> >to construct request container.
> >
> >regards,
> >
> >----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]----------------
> >JTec quality components: http://www.pribluda.de/projects/
> >
> >
> >
> >_____________________________________________________________________ 
> _
> >______________
> >Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with
> >Yahoo! FareChase.
> >http://farechase.yahoo.com/
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
> >
> >    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>
>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email