RE: [picocontainer-dev] Argumentative PC
Konstantin Priblouda <kpriblouda-/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- Jörg Schaible <[email protected]> wrote: > > as for JNDI - I propose: > > 1. JNDI Object reference > > 2. Behaviour based on it ( registering ) - this > could > > be even generic behaviour which stores component > in > > whatever reference is provided upon creation > > Explain more. Current JMX impl supports some > different approaches to create the ObjectName. > Registering is done with the lifecylce (since it > depends on the object wether you have only one > instance or multiple of 'em). We could have generic "referenve behaviour" / "referenced" / reference which is backed by object reference ("object reference is a tool to store things in awkward places") - thus it becomes really easy to depend on such objects. Like: grab hibernate session factory / mail service / transaction service etc. JMX support is just fine. regards, ----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]---------------- JTec quality components: http://www.pribluda.de/projects/ ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email