Re: [picocontainer-dev] Interception (behavior factory) and Intercepted (behavior)
Shawn <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I don't think adding proxy based method interception will make too much
sense.
Because proxy based method interception has too much limitations, paul have
listed most of them :)
Pico have had some integration solutions with 3rd party AOP frameworks such
as DynaAOP, but I'm not sure whether the advices ( for example, the method
interceptor instance) can enjoy dependency injection?
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Interception-%28behavior-factory%29-and-Intercepted-%28behavior%29-tf4306114.html#a12347319
Sent from the NanoContainer - PicoContainer - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email