Re: [picocontainer-dev] Error building pico

--- Paul Hammant <[email protected]> wrote:

> no that's my fault - I know its broken - its going
> to need an  
> additional attribute for the groovy syntax.

I find this feature a little irritating - I thought it
was needed for property resolution?  ( in 1.x 
ambiguity was an error ) This could be handled by
argumented / properity  container instead.
( say, component adapters in those would resolve 
not by type, but by name  / param name only
if property can be converted to actual type ) 

> and its IDEA the IDE that uses PicoContainer
> internally that made  
> that XML error. Though it was my error for not
> building before commit!

Well, I can speak with IDEA developers in their own
(and mine) language  once I see them at javapolis ;) 


regards,

----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]----------------
JTec quality components: http://www.pribluda.de/projects/


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect.  Join Yahoo!'s user panel and lay it on us. http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email