[picocontainer-dev] ArgumentativePC, addConfig() & use names fate ( comments welcome )

Konstantin Priblouda <kpriblouda-/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi all,

I just finished config adapter
(o.n.config.ConfigAdapter)
which transparently converts strings to java objects
( using xstream value converters under covers ) 

Does not it makes APC a bit obsolete? (at least part
of it functionality with converting strings to ints or
booleans) 

The same with addConfig() 

And as component adapters multiply, I would propose
refactoring - sprlit ComponentParameter to
ExplicitParameter (resolutione xplicitely by key, user
has to specify this) and ImplicitParameter ( resolve
by type, created implicitely) 

and do we really need "useNames"? is there real and
common use case for this?

regards,

----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]----------------
JTec quality components: http://www.pribluda.de/projects/


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Shape Yahoo! in your own image.  Join our Network Research Panel today!   http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.