Re: [picocontainer-dev] start/stop probs mentioned a could of months ago.
Paul Hammant <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
sure make the change... :-)
- Paul
On Sep 23, 2007, at 10:04 AM, peter royal wrote:
> On Aug 10, 2007, at 8:15 AM, Paul Hammant wrote:
>> Did you talk of some problems with start/stop and late added
>> components - back when we started Pico 2.x?
>>
>> Any chance you could make a change or two to support your need -
>> with test case?
>
> so, quite behind on reading this list :)
>
> in psuedo-code, say 'container' is the root of a container tree:
>
> try {
> container.start();
> catch( Exception e ) {
> container.stop();
> // yeah, handle the exception
> }
>
> if start fails in a child container, its sensible to want to stop
> what is already started, but that fails once it hits a container
> that has not been started. i think the fix would be to allow stop()
> to be called on an un-started container with no side-effects. (ie,
> start/stop are each idempotent)
> -pete
>
> --
> (peter.royal|osi)@pobox.com - http://fotap.org/~osi
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email