Re: [picocontainer-dev] [6.2/6.0] Re: [picocontainer-dev] Bug or feature?

peter royal <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Nov 26, 2007, at 2:23 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>
>> At the moment I see PICO-203, and no reasoning...
>
>
> Well, I try to remember, it was 2 or 3 years agao ...

i'm sure paul remembers :)

> Additionally it made problems when the CA was saved in a session,  
> since it triggered always the complete Pico hierarchy.

this seems rational, but are CA's ever independently stored in a  
session vs an entire child container?
-pete

-- 
(peter.royal|osi)@pobox.com - http://fotap.org/~osi
smime.p7s (application/pkcs7-signature, 2.4 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.