Re: [picocontainer-dev] Bug or feature?

--- Jörg Schaible <[email protected]> wrote:

> No, I would not do that. You can already cache the
> component itself and then
> a parameter cache is superfluous. And if you have
> the need not to cache the
> component, the probability is high, that some
> parameters have changed ...

maybe I was not precise. It's not about caching
parameters, but caching component adapter list by
parameter ( collection one )  - obtaining this is
pretty expensive, and this list is used at leas twice 
( not only for actual value retrieval, but also
for verification ) 

regards,

----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]----------------
JTec quality components: http://www.pribluda.de/projects/


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better sports nut!  Let your teams follow you 
with Yahoo Mobile. Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/sports;_ylt=At9_qDKvtAbMuh1G1SQtBI7ntAcJ

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email